≡ Menu

Here’s a little video I made to explain why parenting can make sane people feel insane… and what to do about it. Enjoy!

I’m in the business of promoting love, as you know. As a family minister and parent educator, my primary concern is not with what you believe or what you think, it’s in how you love: how you receive it, and how you give it, where your blocks are, and how you can participate in love more fully. I study love from every angle that I find helpful–the theology of it, the psychology of it, what it looks like on a structural/systemic level, what it feels like, and what the lack of it feels like, in the intimate realm.
My own life is of course my lab.
My starting assumption is that everyone wants to participate in love fully. I know this to be true because we are human, and by design we are driven to want to participate in the give and take of mutual connection.
Evolutionarily, our lives have depended on our ability to love one another really well. Or rather, well enough. We aren’t after all a species that can live for long in isolation. We have to find those with whom we can live in a dance of connection, and stick with them over time, in order to have any success in navigating our complex world. That’s what interpersonal neurobiologist Dan Siegel says anyway, in so many words.
Our survival depends on our ability to love one another well enough (thank you Donald Winnicott for the idea of the “good enough parent”)But the more skilled we get at the art of loving well, the more we can move beyond surviving and into the realm of thriving.
There are lots and lots of skills–learnable skills, it turns out–that help us get better and better at the art of loving.
I’ve been learning a lot lately about one skill set in the art of love: repair work.
Relationship repair is a skill that is absolutely necessary because none of us are perfect. Mistakes are downright inevitable in human affairs, and it’s actually really okay. Learning to repair our relationships after discord/upset/ruptured connection is critical though if we are going to stay and grow in relationships.
John Gottman, one of the leading researchers who studies couples, says that couples who learn to repair their relationships are 80% more likely to have longterm satisfying partnerships than those couples who do not master this skill. And apparently, repairing a relationship rupture can make a relationship more intimate and satisfying than if the discord hadn’t happened in the first place!
I’ve been thinking about relationship repair for awhile. Mostly I’ve noticed I’m not very good at it. And then in my relationship with my daughter I started to gain some skill. I made a little video called the Art of Apology awhile back about what I’ve learned about doing repair work in our relationships with our children–which is SO important–and if you’re interested, you can check it out.
I’ve also learned a TON about relationship repair from my husband Niels, who has modeled for me again and again how to stay open and avoid defending myself, how to stay even when I want to run away or shut down, how with him it is safe to admit my personal mistakes or deficits, and that it is okay–more than okay, required even–to ask for what I need.
But I still have so so much to learn. This week, in fact, I had a GREAT learning experience.
My stepdad called to tell me he had read my last blog post, Why I Helicopter Parent, and he wanted to say that he was sorry for having clearly hurt me with his comment about “helicopter parenting.” We spoke for a few minutes, I thanked him for apologizing–I really was grateful that he cared enough to reach out when he gathered I’d been hurt–and I reassured him that it was mostly a great opportunity to write about something I had wanted to write about for awhile. I was touched, and I thought we were done.
Then the next day, I got a voicemail message from him. From his tone, I could tell we were not done. I was with my daughter and wasn’t able to call back. He left another message to call him the next day because he and dad were going out to the opera for the night.
The next day, I took a deep breath and called him back.
“When we got off the phone, I realized something else,” he said, “I was stung by your comment about doctoring during the AIDS epidemic.”
I knew exactly what he was talking about: after making the point that there are good reasons why parenting in the U.S. at this time is hard work, I went on to say that many satisfying human endeavors are hard work, and I used the example of being a doctor in San Francisco doing the AIDS epidemic. I concluded the paragraph with the sentence, “I don’t lean across the table and tell family members that they must be tired from hyper-doctoring.”
What the audience of this blog didn’t know is that mystep-father was a doctor during the AIDS epidemicin San Francisco. When he said he had been stung by my “hyper-doctoring” comment, I realized that indeed I had been pretty hurt by his “helicoptering” comment and that my pointed comment in the post was a passive aggressive rebuttal.
Which of course, is not a highly skilled way of handling relationship repair.
I breathed for a minute and kept listening. He told me how he felt. I let in what he was saying. Thanks to my husband Niels, I had learned a tiny bit about not self-defending. I apologized more than once. Real from-the-heart apologies. I could really see my misstep. And I could see that my first misstep had been in leaping over my own hurt and moving to action: blogging action. When I could have called and done what he did: said, “Wow, that stung.”
We spoke for a few more minutes, and at the end of the conversation he said, “We are going to make mistakes with one another, especially given how close our family is. It’s okay, we’re not perfect.”
I was flooded with love for him, and gratitude that he is in our family now, bringing a whole new set of skills to add to our living system of interconnected limbic brains. I’m 41, but hey, it’s never too late.
What has lingered with me most over the past few days is this: during the entire conversation, my stepdad’s tone of voice was tender. He was tender when he said I had stung him. He was tender when he asked me to step softly with him when talking about the AIDS epidemic. He was tender when he said it was okay for us to make mistakes with one another.
I am reminded of what my longtime hero Cornel West says: the public face of love is justice; the private face of love is tenderness.
And I am reminded of what psychologist Dianne Poole Heller said in a recent training: Tone of voice speaks directly into the amygdala in the human brain–the part of the brain responsible for discerning threat and quickly mobilizing the rest of the brain and nervous system into fight or flight. A high pitched voice, a loud booming voice, or a tight constricted voice, sends the amygdala the message that it’s time to self protect. A tender tone of voice transmits the opposite message: stay, listen, receive me, you are safe. If we can notice and adjust our tone of voice in conflict, we can set the stage to move through it and into deeper connection.
I learned this week something new about the art of loving from my stepdad: hard truth spoken with tenderness WELCOMES relationship repair.
Thank you, Farfar. I think we just got closer.

A few weeks ago we were at a family dinner with my sister, brother-in-law and our three parents (my mom, my dad, and my dad’s husband–how’s that for a Bay Area family?), and Niels and I confessed that we often don’t have plans on Friday evenings even when Leah is with her biological dad. “Why?” My parents wanted to know. “We’re too tired.” We admitted, perhaps lamely.

My dad’s husband (my stepfather), turned to me and said, “From helicoptering all week?” Niels and I looked at one another with raised eyebrows, aware of course that this was a reference to “helicopter parenting” (i.e. hovering, which usually implies, unnecessarily).

“As a matter of fact, yes. I sure am tired from all my helicopter parenting!” I said, and I smiled broadly.

Let me throw in here that I have a great relationship with my stepdad, and I took his comment as a good natured way of teasing me–perhaps a touch clumsily after two glasses of wine, but still–about my “connection-oriented” approach to parenting. So I let it go. We all laughed and moved on to other topics.

But the next day, my stepfather emailed me an article from the New York Times called “The Cure for Hyper-Parenting.” I opened the article and groaned, seeing that it was written by Pamela Druckerman, who wrote the very popular book “Bringing Up Bebe” that I had heard waaaaay too much about over the years–often in opposition to the approach I teach, Parenting by Connection. From what I had gathered about the book, in Bringing up Bebe, Druckerman praises the French for being “hands off” parents, who drop their kids at parks and go have glasses of wine in cafes. I was chagrined to realize she was still ranting on and on about “over-parenting,” and apparently–as an author published in the NY Times–Americans are still listening.

In reading the article though, I realized that we have more in common in our approaches to parenting than I previously thought. Namely, we both feel bad for parents because of how darn hard parents are working to raise their kids, and we both provide ideas for giving parents a needed break. I loved her point that many parent crises arise out of sheer exhaustion, and her solution is perfect: she recommends that we follow the same bedtime routines for ourselves that we do for our children: bath, book, bed. Fabulous. Great plan. Add a glass of wine, and I’m in.

We also agree that toddlers aren’t savages and that parents can talk to their children as if they are intelligent beings; and that we should do what we can to enjoy the process of parenting more than stressing about the outcome of it. Yep, I totally agree. It also sounds like she’s read some of the same brain science books that I devour, and she is aware that children at least benefit from close, attuned interactions with parents. Her argument is that all this “hyper-parenting” isn’t good for the parents.

So… here is where we begin to part ways in our thinking, Ms. Druckerman.

First, “hyper-parenting” is bad for both parents and kids, if by “hyper” we mean the anxiously overactive, vigilant monitoring and intervening that adults who had “anxious attachment styles” with their own parents can be prone to (me included). If you’ve ever had someone watch over you anticipating every possible negative outcome of the project you are engaged in, you’ll understand how children likely feel when they are “hyper-parented.” It’s invasive and unsettling for the child, and yes, exhausting for the parent.

But helicopter parenting might be different than hyper-parenting. For example, helicopter parenting might mean keeping an antenna tuned in to the experience of your child(ren). While an anxious parent is wrapped up in their own worries and thoughts, in order to be tuned in to what a child is experiencing, the parent has to be centered in herself to begin with, and–from that secure seat of herself–noticing and responding to the child. And this kind of tuned in, relaxed, available-and-responsive-but-not-invasive, way of noticing of one’s children, is the kind of attention that children need in order to grow their brains, develop empathy for others, feel part of and in turn cooperate with the family system, and develop the emotional intelligence that even Druckerman thinks is important for parents to teach.

So just to briefly review the neuroscience on why feeling emotionally connected sets kids up to thrive: when a child’s limbic system (social-emotional brain) can tell that an adult is nearby and available (relaxed, present, and open to being engaged), the child’s limbic system sends “safe and secure” feelings throughout the child’s brain and body. This is the “attached state,” or the limbic-ally anchored state, and from here a child’s whole system can operate optimally: the child’s body temperature, heart rate, and immune system all regulate, the child’s emotions become more manageable, and the child has access to the thinking, rational part of her brain. In short, a kid who feels emotionally anchored is healthier, more stable, and more present and available for learning and thinking creatively. In addition, an emotionally anchored child can feel the interconnected system she is part of, and she is predisposed to want to cooperate with that relational system, and participate in its smooth and happy functioning. So, emotionally connected kids are usually more cooperative kids.

Providing a strong and steady sense of emotional connection for children–helping children regularly feel felt as the neuroscientists call it–isn’t “extraneous” to good-enough parenting: it’s central to it, right up there with decent nutrition, physical safety and shelter from the elements (check out my page of resources if you want to read more about this). Responsive, attuned parenting isn’t something parents should be cured of, it should be something they are supported in. Heaven knows that when parents don’t have the resources to provide the secure attachment to build the architecture of a strong, flexible mind of the child, society pays the price.

And you know what? It’s true, providing emotional connection for children is HARD WORK. It’s especially hard work for a parent when no one provided this for you as a kid, and it’s especially hard work when you live in a society that’s moving a hundred miles an hour, where there aren’t structural supports for your hard work as a parent, like seven-week family vacations every year, three-hour lunch breaks for families to be together, paid maternity leave, free quality preschool, and all the other supports that are provided in France where people are bringing up bebes. Yes, parenting in the U.S. is hard work, sometimes even excruciatingly hard. And that sucks. But so are lots of endeavors that adult humans take on–like working crazy hours building bridges that can withstand earthquakes, or being a doctor in San Francisco during the AIDS epidemic…or dealing with global warming–and I don’t lean across the table at family dinners and suggest that any of my relatives are tired because of their hyper-doctoring, hyper-engineering, or whatnot.

Yes, my job is hard, and I love it as much as you love your very hard job.

And besides, just because parenting in the U.S. is so hard doesn’t mean our children need us to do any less. Children here in fast-food nation, with terrible school systems, youth-on-youth violence, and a frenetic, stressed out adult world buzzing around, don’t need attuned attention any less than children in more family-centered societies like France. The sad news for parents here is that American children probably need limbic anchoring even more than les enfants lucky enough to be raised in France, even though we are less set up to provide it.

I think this is my biggest bone to pick with Druckerman, who seems worldly and international in her assessment of things, and yet somehow misses the obvious error in her thinking: how can you possibly pluck out the parenting practices of one culture and recommend them to the parents of a different culture, devoid of all the cultural and structural edifices that make that parenting style possible and effective enough in the first place? Well, the short answer: you can’t. It isn’t news that human beings are shaped by the social systems we are subject to. Luckily, it also isn’t news that we have power to reflect on our social systems and to change them when needed.

So here’s the thing. American parents don’t need to try and parent like the French. Rather than staring enviously at the French parents drinking wine in cafes, or criticizing ourselves for not parenting that way, OR downplaying how much children need the emotional connection that science tells us they need, let’s honestly face and assess our own situation. We are here in a society that doesn’t support the work of parenting, and our kids aren’t doing well. If we borrow anything from the French, let’s borrow their social policy around families. Our responsibility as American parents is to look at what our children need and figure out what it would take to provide for those needs here and now.

Our children need us close and paying attention–not anxiously, not over-reaching to solve their every challenge for them–but tuned in, responsive, and available as they sort out how complex a world they are entering… so that they can develop the kinds of minds that will be able to handle the future we are delivering to them.

Forget about French parenting styles. Let’s just do our best to bring up our own babies.

photo-6We have a vision, a mandate, you might even call it a calling

My husband Niels and I were standing in the kitchen one morning, emptying the dishwasher, and chewing on some issues that were coming up at our daughter’s school. That’s when it came to us, almost like a moment of divine revelation: one day every child will be heard, and every parent, teacher and caregiver will be supported. And part of that is our work to do.

But let me back up.

When my husband Niels and I fell in love, my daughter was five years old. He was a very brave man: I wasn’t just a mother, I was a parent educator with some very strong opinions.

It’s to Niels’ credit that he not only endured, but enthusiastically participated, in hundred of hours of conversation about children, parenting, and what it’s like to do it in the world we live in. He also quite readily put himself into the throws of day to day life with my child, without hesitating, pretty much right away.

When most new couples would have been enjoying candle lit dinners, we were eating hot dogs and watching my daughter twirl around the living room between bites. When most new couples would have been enjoying weekends in Napa, we were teaching her to ride a bike. When most new couples would have been enjoying luxuriously long days in bed, we enjoyed stolen moments on the couch (while my daughter slept in our big bed).

Niels, being an anthropologist by trade, adapted to this new culture (life with a child) in a heartbeat. Just as he had done on four continents in a myriad of different cultures before this one, Niels learned the ways of this world, and excelled at them.

He also brought to the work–of parenting, of parent education–a broader perspective about people, relationships, and social change. And we joined forces. He officially joined me in my work, and we created Parent Connect East Bay.

That day in the kitchen, we began to see just what this would mean for the long trajectory of our lives. We began to see the shape of the movement we are participating in.

Every Child Heard | Every Parent Supported

You see, there’s just no doubt any more about the essential conditions that help children grow into confident, empathic, innovative thinkers: a deep sense of emotional connection with parents and primary caregivers.

It’s the daily, tuned in, contingent moments of communication and connection between adult and child that build the very structure of the young developing brain. The way we are with children–what we model, the emotional atmosphere we create, and how we respond–these things literally build their brains. (I’ve got a whole page dedicated to resources about this, if you’d like to read more).

When I tell parents this, however, color drains out of their faces. Sometimes a look of despair even sets in–I think they are flashing back to the last time they totally lost with their kids. So I tell them: before you run down the road of “I’m-going-to-bad-parent-hell” remember this: your kids’ brains and bodies are also designed to be resilient, to heal, and to make the most out of challenges. The brain is plastic and the nervous system is built to bounce back, with help.

I also tell parents, it’s totally not your fault that it feels impossible many days to provide the tuned in, gentle but firm, playfully responsive attention that children look for and need. After all, did anyone do this with you when you were a child? And how many other things were demanding your attention when you lost it with the kids–was dinner on the stove? Had you been up since 5:00AM and on your feet every moment, even for meals? Had anyone recently taken you aside and said, “Wow, you are working so hard with your kids, and they are GREAT. How can I help? Here, let me take that laundry basket”???

We can dump volumes of great advice and research findings from neuroscience into the laps of parents, but until the world becomes a place where parents receive the kind of respect, attunement, and support we are asking them to provide children, we haven’t really done them a good enough service.

Without supporting parents, we haven’t done children much of a service at all (likewise, teachers, childcare providers, etc).

So there we were in the kitchen that morning, discussing these things while emptying the dishwasher and finishing our tea. “This is just not the way children need the world to be.” We fell quiet and still for a moment, wondering what this all meant for our work with parents.

And then it came to us, almost like a promise whispered from on far: Every Child Heard | Every Parent Supported.  And with this clear direction, an awareness: the tide is changing, and we are riding a wave. Humankind knows now more than ever before in human history what children need to thrive. And we need them to thrive more than ever: the world they will inherit will require empathetic hearts, innovative minds, and courageous spirits, all around. There will be no more going on autopilot, these kids have to be vital and vigorous. And we know what they need to develop these attributes. It’s something we can totally do. But we have to do it together. Together with many others.

Giving children what they need, and supporting the adults who provide it, is the best way of shaping our collective future. And WE have a small, but critical part to play.

We believe this so strongly that we’ve made this the motto that organizes our life and our work.

So, how do we get there?

Well, there’s a lot we still don’t know, but we know these things for sure:

  • Children who feel emotionally connected to their parents are children who THRIVE.
  • Parents must feel emotionally connected to be able to raise emotionally connected children.
  • The world we live in now does not support close emotional connection for children or parents.
  • We need community leaders who understand the value of connection in the lives of children and parents, and who create organizations, practices, and policies that support connection.
  • Community leaders must feel emotionally connected themselves to be able to support parents and children to feel emotionally connected.

There are many, many wonderful resources out there to help parents learn how to build the contingent, connected relationships with their children that they need to grow, develop, and thrive. It’s wonderful (and sometimes daunting) to be raising children in a time when so much known about what they need to function at their best. I teach Parenting by Connection because I think this approach offers some unique tools and perspectives, particularly when it comes to supporting children in their most emotional moments, and in understanding that parents need emotional support in order to be able to provide it to children. I see this approach transform family after family. But this is not yet enough.

We know that the manifestation of our vision is something we will do with many, many other community leaders. To learn more, we spent the Summer of 2014 interviewing community leaders who are committed to creating the best possible outcomes for children and families. It was mind-blowing and heart-warming to feel the commitment that leaders have to young people and their parents in our community. It was also clear that these same leaders feel as stressed, as isolated, and in need of new connection-based practices, as anyone.

One Small Step: The Community Leaders Group

Starting in September 2014, Niels and I took a small step toward creating the kind of group that we think will help community leaders feel emotionally supported in the hard work they do for children and families, and support them in bringing connection-based practices further into their work with children and parents.

This Group is called the Community Leaders Group.

Right now the group is made up of several local Parenting by Connection Instructors, and other community leaders–a home-based childcare center director, a teacher, a minister, a doula, a therapist, and the director of a new connection-promoting business in the East Bay.

All of these people are parents themselves who have been through the introductory Parenting by Connection course and have continued to use the Listening Tools, and other practices to build connected families and bring connection to the broader community of families they serve.

Right now our focus in this group is on providing lots and lots of support and listening to the Community Leaders, whose leadership begins at home and extends outward into the world, and who carry substantial responsibility in each realm of their lives. This group is intended to bring support to the critical work these leaders are doing in every realm of their lives: from the most intimate on outward. (Interested? Click here for meeting dates and times).

But we have a lot more we’d like to bring to this group. We want to bring everything we’ve got: my fifteen years work in the youth development field on policy change and program development, Niels two decades in the field of anthropology and work as a college professor, and both of our experience as ministers. We are taking some time to plan for an expansion of the offerings we make to Community Leaders beginning in September 2015, including much more support and training for connection-oriented leaders who serve children and families.

We are excited to be in the process of developing this content, so stay tuned for updates in the early months of 2015.

Every Child Heard | Every Parent, Teacher, & Caregiver Supported

Do you have a part to play?

When my daughter was two, we were making our usual visit to the Thursday afternoon Farmer’s Market in Berkeley when we encountered another toddler having a temper tantrum on the lawn. The toddler’s mother was desperately trying to get the child off the grass–where she was wailing and kicking–and back into her stroller. The mom had the horrified look that we all get when our children “lose it” in public.

My daughter dropped my hand and walked over to the child on the grass, gently lowering herself to the ground on her back beside the wailing child. The child stopped her thrashing, but her sobs continued, and my daughter carefully inched toward her until their heads were touching lightly together. My daughter turned her head slightly and gazed sideways at the other child, head-to-head with her.

Then, to the amazement of the adults who gathered around, two other toddlers who had been playing nearby joined my daughter and the crying girl on the lawn, laying with their heads all together on the grass, their bodies like spokes of a wheel. The crying child sobbed for another minute or so while her new toddler friends stayed calm and close, and then as we parents looked on, our jaws hanging, she carefully sat up and slowly climbed back into her stroller.

Common lore says that toddlers are too young to be able to empathize with others, but this hasn’t been my experience at all. What my daughter and the other toddlers demonstrated that afternoon at the Farmer’s Market was that children are inclined toward empathy, and that when they witness it, they want to participate in it.

This was not a stand-alone event, though. My daughter was just doing what is normal at our house: when feelings begin to flow, those who love you move in close, make contact and listen without trying to solve the problem. And when everyone has had their good cry or needed outburst, we can carry on with a smooth day together (for the most part). Leah was showing what I received over many years from an array of amazing teachers, and what has become a way of life for me.

Let me explain.

Twenty years ago, my dear friend Jasmin Sanders showed me a radical way of being with children that she had learned from her teacher, Patty Wipfler, the founder of Hand-in-Hand Parenting. So when I was thirty five and struggling with a baby who wouldn’t nurse, wouldn’t sleep, and wouldn’t stop crying, I looked Patty Wipfler up—and thank God that I did! She taught me how to companion my daughter compassionately (though not permissively) through all that life threw at us (and that was considerable).

Annie Tyson, who trained with Patty for the twenty years when her two children were growing up, has been my closest teacher during these years of parenting. Her spacious, loving, available attention was my lifeline especially through my years as a single parent, simultaneously living with a chronic and debilitating digestive condition. With regular doses of her extraordinarily loving attention, I was able to return and be present again for my unfolding relationship with my daughter.

I had some preparation before becoming a parent though. For several years before my daughter was born, Barbara Knyper was my teacher. She taught me how to lean into all my life experience, sensing deeply into even the painful parts rather than shying away. This equipped me for parenting in ways I could not have anticipated. Parenting breaks your heart open again and again, as I’m sure you’ve noticed, and being able to stay open to that, has also allowed me to stay open to the connection, the sweetness, the depth of love. In Barbara’s powerful presence, and in the field of her gentle, curious, courageous attention, my own presence was welcomed forth.

Rev. Karen Foster, Rev. Rebecca Parker, and Rev. Lynice Pinkard all modeled for me how to minister with my head and my heart in concert with one another. They each “got” me, and showed me how to bring myself forth–my mind and my compassion–to my relationships with congregants. And, oh my, that helped during the years when my congregation was reduced to one: one stunning, brilliant, demanding and spirited child, my Leah…who needed me with her fully, head and heart.

But my first teacher, and the teacher that has been with me the longest, through thick and thin, is my own mother, Karolyn Jernigan. My mother has taught me to be tenacious about sticking with the learnings of parenting, and how to make a priority of ones relationship with ones children. She has modeled how to turn every challenge, every wrinkle, every conflict, even every devastation, into a chance to learn and grow in love, and a chance to deepen our relationship.

So, yes, I have been blessed with a truly extraordinary line of women teachers who have helped me develop my own heart, my own presence, my own capacity to listen and pay attention. They said many things to me over time, but the greatest teaching was in how they were with me. In being spacious, offering clear, precise attention, warmth, acceptance, and confidence in me… they infected me with their empathy, with their courage to stay open and present through difficulties, m y own and those of others.

Empathy is a like a wonderful virus, a highly communicable one. The women teachers in my life each infected me with their own variety of it, and I then could not help but pass it on to my child…

And that day at the Farmer’s Market, I watched as Leah infected the other toddlers with her warm, generous, accepting attention. And I thought: yes, child, take up this lineage we have been so privileged to participate in, and pass it on with your gorgeous self…

Empathy breeds empathy.
Pass it on.

The cognitive part of the brain will take over 20 years to become fully developed, but the social-emotional part of the brain–the limbic brain–is functional from birth. From the moment a baby arrives, the limbic part of the brain can sense who is available to “tune into” the baby’s experience… an ability that likely developed because human offspring are utterly dependent on adult humans for survival, and being able to signal that they need attention led to greater survival. Most babies need “tuned in” and responsive attention quite regularly (from every few seconds to every few minutes)

and when they feel connected in this way to an adult person, the baby’s brain and nervous system is flooded with a sense of well-being. This “connected feeling” is called a “limbically anchored” state, and when limbically anchored, the baby can be engaged in the present moment, taking in new experiences of life, and building new neural connections at a dramatic rate.

When children are limbically anchored, they are at their BEST: they can cooperate, demonstrate empathy, learn… their immune systems function well, heart rates are regulated, etc. As children get older, they can carry with them an internalized sense of being connected (or limbically anchored) for increasing amounts of time. But as young children, the reminders and reassurance that an adult is there for them, “sees” them and “feels” them, is a necessary ingredient for their good functioning.

So what looks like “selfish” or “out of control” behavior in children is just what a disconnected–limbically unanchored–child presents like: they are literally out of their minds! They cannot access the thinking part of the brain, their physiologies start to go beserk, and they go into “fright or flight.” Because we live in a society of disconnection, because parents are stretched so thin, and because schools have so many children per adult, children are chronically disconnected… which is why they behave so badly. But connected kids are empathetic, cooperative, caring and relatively reasonable kids, I promise.

Not that we adults aren’t doing the same, but most of us have found some socially acceptable ways of managing our disconnected state. Like drinking a lot, picking up sugar when we feel bad, focusing on other people’s problems, becoming workaholics… or simply shutting down with lethargy or cynicism, or both. 

Connected kids are empathetic, cooperative, caring and relatively reasonable kids, I promise. I haven;t met a family yet where this has shown itself to be true.

“The first duty of love is to listen.” Paul Tillich
Children have sharp inner moral compasses. When we ask them to overlook experiences of injustice–large or small–by “being nice,” remaining silent, or making things more convenient, we are scrambling this critical ability to detect and respond powerfully when things aren’t right.

In Learning to be White: Money, Race and God in America, Unitarian Universalist minister and author, Thandeka, describes the early experiences of shame, self-betrayal, and fear that are at the root of people’s eventual agreement to participate in systems of oppression–even for those who are privileged by those systems.

When children tell us, “It’s not fair!” we need to lean in close, make eye contact and listen. Even if we don’t agree with the specific example they are upset about, don’t worry, this one is probably just a pretext for expressing the deeper feelings associated with witnessing injustice. 

We when listen carefully and respectfully to children, even if we can’t grant them what they are wanting, we are keeping intact and even sharpening their ability to discern and respond powerfully to injustice.

Let’s keep our kids as radical as they were at birth. We need their moral compasses intact if they are to effectively shape this world they are inheriting.

“The first duty of love is to listen.” Paul Tillich
Note to self: Connection-based parenting is not the same thing as hovering or being overly involved with my child. When children feel connected, they are secure enough to be independent; they enjoy the chance to delve into their own projects and adventures, try things out, solve problems, explore on their own. 

I know this from my marriage. Now that I am in a solid and consistently loving relationship, I feel MORE free to explore my own thoughts and ideas. I go further and deeper into my own adventures now. And I always know I can “check back in” if I need to or want to, because I know he will be there, excited, interested, ready to share from his own adventures.

My daughter will let me know when she needs me. I do not need to step in so quickly, solve anything for her, or assume that I have the answer she is struggling to find. I am here, and she knows how to get to me if she needs or wants me. I am practicing waiting to be asked for help. 

Connection and independence are not adversaries. Joyful connection breeds joyful independence.